Google
Computer, Internet, Software, Links … :: Intel vs AMD :: November :: 2006

Intel vs AMD

November 6, 2006

Kentsfield is, in fairly simple terms, a dual-dual-core. It’s two Conroe cores whacked next to each other. To communicate with each other, the cores have to go out to the front side bus for a chat, rather than just having a natter over the hedge, so to speak. Not only does this add latency to the inter-core comms, it also occupies valuable space on the front side bus which could otherwise be used by main memory. Technically, this makes Kentsfield a slower chip than a native quad-core implementation. AMD has been making a lot of noise about the fact that its first quad-core chip will

Read more  http://www.bit-tech.net/columns/2006/11/05/In_defence_of_multi_core/1.html 

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://hexterisist.blogsome.com/2006/11/06/intel-vs-amd/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.